are email, search, contextual and onsite traffic. Email marketing includes newsletters, email lists and list management. Search traffic includes all paid traffic sources including search engines, content network and media buys. Contextual traffic involves Pay Per View traffic which involves promoting via pop ups or pop unders. Onsite placement is when affiliates own their own
Excerpt from:
Allowed Traffic Types
are email, search, contextual and onsite traffic. Email marketing includes newsletters, email lists and list management. Search traffic includes all paid traffic sources including search engines, content network and media buys. Contextual traffic involves Pay Per View traffic which involves promoting via pop ups or pop unders. Onsite placement is when affiliates own their own
See the original post:
Allowed Traffic Types
are email, search, contextual and onsite traffic. Email marketing includes newsletters, email lists and list management. Search traffic includes all paid traffic sources including search engines, content network and media buys. Contextual traffic involves Pay Per View traffic which involves promoting via pop ups or pop unders. Onsite placement is when affiliates own their own
Read more from the original source:
Allowed Traffic Types
are email, search, contextual and onsite traffic. Email marketing includes newsletters, email lists and list management. Search traffic includes all paid traffic sources including search engines, content network and media buys. Contextual traffic involves Pay Per View traffic which involves promoting via pop ups or pop unders. Onsite placement is when affiliates own their own
Read the rest here:
Allowed Traffic Types
Google announced that it now offering cross-domain support of the rel=”canonical” link element. If you are unfamiliar with this link element, Google’s Matt Cutts discussed it with us here . Basically, it’s a way to avoid duplicate content issues, but until now, you couldn’t use it across domains. “For some sites, there are legitimate reasons to [have] duplicate content across different websites — for instance, to migrate to a new domain name using a web server that cannot create server-side redirects,” says John Mueller, Webmaster Trends Analyst with Google Z
Remember when Microsoft’s Bing launched and one of the features that really caught people’s attention was the interface of its image search feature? It was unique in that you could simply scroll down on the results page infinitely. You didn’t have to go to multiple pages to find more images. You just kept scrolling. Google is now testing such a feature for its own image search results. In actuality, this feature was not exactly new to Bing. As Barry Schwartz notes at Search Engine Land, Microsoft had actually already been doing this with Live Search, which became Bing. It’s just that most people didn’t use Live Search, so when they checked out Bing, it might as well have been new. Microsoft has been using the feature since 2006 (and even used similar functionality on its web results at one time), but Google (not to mention the now defunct Amazon A9) also used it – just not in image search. Google’s SearchMash test site, which also launched in 2006 took advantage. That was a different time though. Now Bing has come out and stole a small, but significant amount of the search industry’s mindshare away from Google, and one feature that people like about it is the infinite scroll in image search. Maybe Google recognizes that people like that and wants to deliver a similar user experience. Keep in mind, the feature is only being tested with a small percentage of Google users though. There’s no guarantee that it will even become a feature. A spokesperson for Google told Schwartz that they are “continually testing new interfaces and features to enhance the user experience,” and that they didn’t have any additional details to share about it. So there’s only room for speculation at this point. One thing worth noting is that Google has been really geared up about making the web faster. If you go over to Bing’s image search and scroll through some results, I think you’ll quickly find that this method of browsing results is indeed faster than clicking over to multiple pages (although your own Internet connection could affect this). Will Google implement this kind of functionality eventually? It wouldn’t be the first instance of the search engine including Bing-like features . Related Articles: > Google Puts More Images (And One Big Pic) On Results Pages > Google Experiments with a New Image Search Feature > Google “Similar Images” Feature Goes From Labs to Actual Feature
The rest is here:
Viewing Google Image Search Results All on One Page
About a month ago, WebProNews interviewed Google’s Matt Cutts , who suggested that page speed may soon become a ranking factor in the world’s most popular search engine. Speed has been a consistent theme with the company over the past year or so, with the release of various tools and announcements. It has become quite evident that Google places a great deal of importance on speeding up the web. With that in mind, it’s not hard to see why Cutts’ suggestion could soon become a reality. Google has always maintained that it is trying to deliver the best user experience, and by delivering results that load quickly users should get just that. Do you think it’s a good idea for Google to use speed as a ranking factor? Share your thoughts here . While many webmasters are embracing the notion of speed as a ranking factor as a welcome change, there are also plenty of people who do take issue with it for a variety of reasons. We’ve had some interesting comments from readers on the subject. Here are some of them: So, we all have to pay for the most expensive hosting now or we won’t get found in search engines. I won’t be able to host on my own servers at work now. It went from paying for backlinks with huge advertising corporations to get sites PageRank up, Now we have to go with even bigger corporations that can afford to have a massive pipe connecting to the Internet. I don’t think Google mean to, but they are squeesing the poor people of the World out from search results and glorifying huge corporations – Be careful Google! … Page speed is going to be a big political issue. Apart from concerns about net neutrality, what about countries who’s internet infrastructure is vastly inferior to the technology rich countries. Regions like south east asia and central china have much better connections than east africa. Even some parts of Scotland have poor internet links based on the ageing BT networks. Also the people who can afford dedicated servers and high quality bandwidth have a big advantage over the common Joe who has to rely on shared hosting. Does this make google less democratic? or are they just following what they think people want, ie faster loading sites? … What do you think will happen to the sites that are mainly using rich media like video blogs? Can they really accelerate their load time? If not, are they doomed to drop from the SERP? … The speed thing concerns me. Next to a tiered internet its the biggest slam agains the small time net player. Corporations will take over fast and knock out anyone who can’t afford a lightning fast server. Those are just a few reader comments that were left on the video interview. You can read them all here . You can read quite a few more on this related article as well. Voice your own concerns here . Regardless of how you feel about the possibility of Google using page speed as a ranking factor, it’s probably going to happen, and it’s something you’re more than likely going to have to deal with. Besides this even being a factor for regular organic results, consider Google’s recently introduced real-time results . The quicker Google can crawl you, the quicker you can potentially appear in this section. As far as speeding up your site in general, Bill Hartzer recently shared a few tips on the subject in an interview with WebProNews: And of course, Google has its own tips. The company offered a few on site performance improvement using its Webmaster Tools . Webmaster Tools has a Site Performance feature, which shows you a performance overview graph. This looks at the aggregated speed numbers for your site, based on the pages that were most frequently accessed by visitors who use the Google Toolbar and have the PageRank feature activated. “By using data from Google Toolbar users, you don’t have to worry about us testing your site from a location that your users do not use,” explains John Mueller, Webmaster Trends Analyst, Google Z